I’m a student
Compare stage-specific assessments, review the competencies measured and manage your results from one candidate account.
Compare candidate assessments →Loading GlobalPass+…
Loading GlobalPass+…
GlobalPass+ provides structured, stage-specific assessments for undergraduate and postgraduate candidates. Each assessment examines practical, academic and future-focused competencies through controlled forms and defined scoring criteria.
A live, stage-specific view of eligible undergraduate assessment results. Publication requires an issued result, completed integrity review and explicit candidate consent.
Swipe across the live Index to view all indicators →
| RK | CANDIDATE | CTRY | INSTITUTION | GPI | ΔRK | PCTL | ANL | AI | CULT | STATUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Amina K. | KE | University of Nairobi | 824 | ▲ 2 | 99.4 | 92 | 93 | 94 | INDEXED |
| 02 | Daniel M. | UG | Makerere University | 817 | ▼ 1 | 99.1 | 95 | 89 | 88 | INDEXED |
| 03 | Lerato N. | ZA | University of Cape Town | 809 | — | 98.7 | 88 | 93 | 91 | INDEXED |
| 04 | Samuel A. | GH | University of Ghana | 801 | ▲ 4 | 98.2 | 91 | 84 | 90 | INDEXED |
| 05 | Maya R. | IN | University of Delhi | 795 | NEW | 97.8 | 90 | 91 | 86 | INDEXED |
| 06 | Wei J. | SG | National University of Singapore | 789 | ▲ 1 | 97.3 | 93 | 94 | 87 | INDEXED |
An eligible formal result connects a competency report to the assessment version, scoring model and current result status. A credential record supports controlled sharing; it does not constitute accreditation or guarantee admission or employment.
Assessment, form and version recorded at issue
Candidate, institution and employer workspaces provide different controls while maintaining explicit access boundaries for results.
Compare stage-specific assessments, review the competencies measured and manage your results from one candidate account.
Compare candidate assessments →Evaluate applicant or cohort competencies through defined assessment campaigns and permission-based reporting.
Discuss an institutional assessment →Commission structured candidate assessments, compare role-relevant competencies and review permissioned results.
Discuss an employer assessment →Coverage and difficulty vary by assessment stage. The competency framework is applied through scenario, evidence, data and constructed-response tasks rather than self-reported claims.
Evaluate evidence, assumptions, arguments and competing explanations.
Structure unfamiliar problems and select defensible actions under constraints.
Assess AI output, identify unsupported claims and retain accountable human oversight.
Use digital tools securely, appropriately and with informed attention to data.
Interpret technological, economic and social developments in relevant contexts.
Work across communication contexts without relying on stereotypes.
Prioritise information, adapt to an audience and contribute to shared decisions.
Assess source quality, methods, uncertainty and the limits of available evidence.
Prioritise, delegate and account for stakeholder impact in complex situations.
Balance evidence, ethics, risk and responsibility in academic or workplace decisions.
Foundations, University Entry, Undergraduate Benchmark and Graduate Launch examine foundational reasoning, independent study, information evaluation, digital capability, communication and transition into professional environments.
Postgraduate Readiness and Professional Leadership examine advanced reasoning, research capability, specialist learning readiness, strategic decisions, leadership potential and professional judgement.
Undergraduate assessments focus on academic potential and foundational competencies. Postgraduate assessments place greater weight on advanced reasoning, research capability, leadership potential and professional judgement.
Pre-A-Level, O-Level, GCSE or equivalent
Final secondary year or preparing to join university
University years 1–3
Final-year undergraduate or recent graduate
Preparing for postgraduate study
Postgraduate student or postgraduate job seeker
Assessment claims are limited to the evidence available. Version history, review decisions and interpretation limits are recorded.
Competency blueprints, item review, pilot analysis, provisional bands and the evidence required before claims are final.
Read the methodology →Limited verification data, candidate-controlled sharing, audit trails and a published vulnerability-reporting route.
Review security controls →Named decision owners, recorded human review, clear appeals and an auditable trail for consequential actions.
See governance commitments →The undergraduate track focuses on academic potential, foundational and transferable competencies, independent study and progression into professional environments. The postgraduate track uses more advanced research, source-evaluation, strategic-decision and constructed-response tasks, with greater emphasis on specialist readiness, leadership potential and professional judgement.
Formal assessment prices begin at US$50 and use three purchasing-power bands. Billing country, card country, residence, institution and approved vouchers help determine eligibility; IP address alone does not.
Formal assessments run from 60 to 110 minutes. Any short diagnostic offered during a controlled pilot provides preparation guidance only; it does not issue a formal credential, readiness status or GlobalPass Index score.
An eligible formal result may include a score report, competency profile, provisional score interpretation and credential record with an ID and QR status check. Issuance follows the applicable scoring and integrity-review workflow. Eligible undergraduate candidates may separately opt into the relevant public Index.
GlobalPass+ does not claim accreditation, regulatory equivalence, admissions acceptance or employer recognition unless a specific relationship and scope have been published. Institutions and employers should use a result as one transparent source of competency evidence alongside academic records, experience and human judgement.